Underground Infrastructure

Build spatial records of accessible underground infrastructure.

Document manhole interiors and accessible underground spaces with a capture plan suited to visibility, access, and the intended inspection record. Combine spatial outputs with the asset information your team already maintains.

The project challenge

Define what can be observed before selecting the equipment.

MX-100 point-cloud output examples showing reconstructed underground structures
MX-100 point-cloud output examples showing reconstructed underground structures.

Manholes, accessible chambers, and larger underground spaces have different geometry and operating constraints. Establish the required coverage and access method first, then select the capture and processing workflow for each part of the program.

Useful deliverables

Define the record your team needs.

Interior geometry

Review reconstructed visible surfaces for the selected manhole or accessible space.

Dated condition records

Keep inspection identifiers and capture dates with each delivered dataset.

Comparison inputs

Plan alignment and comparable coverage before attempting before-and-after review.

From planning to handover

A workflow for underground infrastructure.

  1. 01

    Define asset boundaries

    Identify openings, accessible spaces, required surfaces, and known access constraints.

  2. 02

    Plan suitable capture

    Separate dedicated manhole collection from any operator-accessible scanning route.

  3. 03

    Reconstruct and align

    Check the processed result and the coordinate basis required by the project.

  4. 04

    Archive and review

    Deliver the agreed files with asset identifiers, dates, and coverage limitations.

Project requirements

Agree these requirements before capture.

  • Access conditions. Select equipment and procedures around the environment and authorized access.
  • Direct visibility. Concealed infrastructure cannot be inferred solely from a surface scan.
  • Repeat visits. Agree reference positions and matching coverage for later comparison.
  • Asset handover. Confirm formats, coordinate context, and any inspection report fields before collection.

Relevant systems

Choose around the capture task.

MX-100

Evaluate the dedicated workflow for manhole interior reconstruction and inspection records.

Explore MX-100 →

Cobra S & X

Consider handheld capture for spaces that are accessible and suitable for operator-carried scanning.

Explore Cobra S & X →

Pentra

Evaluate its portable form and broad coverage for connected accessible spaces, subject to site conditions.

Explore Pentra →

Evaluate the selected hardware and processing configuration using the project’s environment, required detail, and deliverables.

Related reading and resources

Explore the evidence and supporting workflow.

Underground Infrastructure questions

Does this provide a map of all buried infrastructure?

Scope the record around observed surfaces and supplied asset information. Buried or inaccessible routes require separate evidence and investigation.

Can repeated scans show changes?

Plan comparable coverage, a consistent reference, and an agreed assessment method. Differences in capture or processing must be considered during comparison.

Define the access, asset types, and record you need.